판화가 대화하는 법
Multilogue: On Print
|
판화가 대화하는 법
|
|
가장 역사적인 매체인
판화의 가장 동시대적인 대화법
참여작가ㅣ강정헌, 구성수, 김상구, 곽남신, 박영진, 백순실, 이지연, 홍성담
최근 90년대를 돌아보는 대중문화 안에서 아날로그에서 디지털로의 변화 중 등장했던 많은 매체들이 그려진다. 당시 미술계 안에서 화두가 되었던 첨단 매체는 바로 판화였다. ‘판으로 찍은 그림’이라는 뜻의 판화는 주로 ‘판’을 거친다는 간접성이 새로운 표현방식으로 주목받았다. 그러나 종이에 찍힌 평면적 이미지 이상으로 판화가 어떻게 ‘뉴미디어’로서 각광을 받았던 것일까? 한국현대판화사의 주요작품들을 소장하고 있는 BSSM 백순실미술관은 위와 같은 물음에서 출발하며 일련의 전시들을 통해 판화의 매체적 함의에 대해 살펴보고자
한다. 판화를 장르로 규정짓기 보다 하나의 매체로서 그 동시대적, 확장적 의미를 탐색해 나가는데 있어 첫 단추가 될 이 전시는 판화의 여러 매체적 특징 중 복수성에
관한 것에서부터 출발하고자 한다. 회화나 조각과 달리 하나의 유일성으로부터 벗어남을 가능케 했던 판화의 복수성은 그것이 인쇄술의 역사로
소급되거나 오늘날 디지털의 무한복제와 견주어지게 하는 가장 역사적이면서 또한 가장 현대적인 요소이다. 시간성, 과정, 협업 같은 매우 동시대적인 키워드를 품고 있는 ‘판’이라는 요소를 통해 여러 형식과 성격의 복수로 존재할 있다는 것, 그로 인해 새로운 형태의 관계성이 논의의 장으로 들어오게 되고, 디지털과 같은 보다 유연한 새로운 매체와 자연스럽게 접점을 형성하게 되는 것, 이것이 판화에 잠재되어 있는 복수성의 미학이라 할 수 있을 것이다. 매체로서의 판화를 이같이 해석하기 위해 이 전시는 판화뿐 아니라 회화, 조각, 사진들을 통해 판화에 대한 개념적인 질문을 던진다. 민중미술판화와 모더니즘 판화의 복수성을 대조하며 복수성을 물리적으로 보여주는 것에서 시작해 음〮양각의
판과 필름사진의 메커니즘을 연결짓고, 관계성을 탐색하는 가구조각을 통해 에디션과 관객의 관계를 은유하는 이 전시는 ‘판화’에 관한 전시이기보다 예술에 대한 개념, 사고의 형태를 재고하게 하는 판화라는 동시대적 매체에 관한 보다 열린 의미의 전시가 될 것이다.
주최ㅣ블루메미술관
기획 및 글ㅣ김은영
진행ㅣ이우현
교육ㅣ김소영, 이신영
디자인ㅣ엄진아
|
Printmaking
as a medium and its multiplicity
Participating
artistsㅣJung
Hun Kang, Sung Soo
Koo, Sang Ku Kim, Nam Sin Kwak, Young Jin Park, Soon Shil Baik, Ji Yen Lee, Sung Dam Hong
BSSM
housing major print works from contemporary Korean print history plans to hold
exhibitions constantly to showcase new interpretations on printmaking from
diverse perspectives. This exhibition will be a first attempt to explore the
extended import of printmaking as a medium, rather than as a genre, deriving
from multiplicity, the most historical, central theme in discussion on the
hallmarks of printmaking as a medium. Printmaking enables artists to depart
from the uniqueness of painting and sculpture. It adopts multiplicity for the
expansion of space impossible to attain in painting, which makes it date back
to the history of printing techniques and also compared to infinitesimal
digital reproduction of the times. The form and purpose to produce multiple
images from a matrix can be different. The matrix can reproduce images and
messages limitlessly as in mass production for mass communication and it can also
limit the multiplicity as ‘editions’ bearing a scarcity of art distinguished it
from mechanical reproduction. To Hong Sung Dam, who adopted the medium of printmaking
for the wide propagation of his messages within the stream of Minjungmisul
(people’s art) woodcut print of the 1980s, woodblock or rubber plate had a
strong purpose for spreading pressing social messages, quickly and extensively.
In his May Gwangju Democratic Uprising series, plates document historical fact,
prints bring recorded messages to time and space where the general public
gathers, and an act of printing with a plate is a way of social communication. Unlike
Hong, Baik Soon Shil has explored the medium of printmaking as an extension of
modernist painting. To the artist, a repetitive act of printmaking is like a
new language of expression. Her print series have communicated with the general
public by being published serially in mass-print materials like a magazine,
transcending the arena of fine arts. To the artist however, the concept of multiplicity
in printmaking sets her art free from the limit of sole-ness that painting
retains, but the notion of editions makes printmaking a way of artistic
expression. In Hong Sung Dam’s prints, multiplicity is toward society, whereas
Baik has addressed the multiplicity of printmaking within the internal logic of
fine art. As such, printmaking has multiplicity with different characteristics.
In all their prints however, a plate or a matrix is their departure point. Like
the camera lens, the plate is a physical frame intermediating the artist and
the world, suggestive of an accidental, controlled process of pressing and
printing and extended temporality. Moreover, the space and time in the plate encapsulate
immediate, individual traces, envisaging the possibility of integration into
work in other genres through collaboration with other artists. Prior to
discussing the possibility of “plates”, which can be extended through the
keywords of the times such as temporality, process, and collaboration, Kim Sang Ku has adhered to their
most primal form of existence. His woodcut print minimalizes the distance
between plate and artist, directly revealing the elements of materiality and
action. In his prints, you can feel the texture of the wooden plate as well as
the attitude and the movement of the artist toward it. Simple knife lines imply
the moment a knife touches the plate, and the large black-and-white planes
unveil wood grain. While Kim’s printmaking is a potent implication of a plate’s
relational existence with the artist, Koo Sung Soo’s photography seems as the
metaphor of the mechanism of plates working as a free-standing matrix. Koo’s Photogenic Drawing series is a
conceptual presentation of the mechanism of film in photography - like the
plate in printmaking. He creates an intaglio image by pressing an actual plant
on a clay plate, makes a relief by pouring plaster into the intaligo and then
photographs the painted relief. This long process of production ranging from a
concave to a convex plate, from negative film to digital print comments on the
true nature of photography to imprint and represent three dimensional world by appropriating
sculptural, pictorial processes. This process also sounds like a metaphoric
comment on the matrix of the print media, on time and processes accumulated on
the plates in which the time and space of an object is filtered, condensed, and
made two-dimensional by the medium of a two-dimensional plate, turning again to
three-dimensional space and time by being reproduced by printing. The multiplicity of printmaking
deriving from the existence of such “plate” generates a relationship at the
moment one becomes two. This characteristic enables us to look back on diverse
aspects of a relationship that is lineal and absolute or situational and
relative: a relationship between original plate and edition; a relationship
between edition and edition; and a relationship between multiple editions and
different viewers, places, time, and contexts. As in the relational order between plate and print, Kwak
Nam Sin addresses the shadow as the theme of his work. Shadows are subordinate
to realistic things and can always be in existence in relation with something.
However, the shadows transforming all into black planes attain freedom as a
signifier, remaining out of a one-to-one relationship. Kwak’s sculpture and
painting presenting suggestive scenes with such shadows, especially with the
shadows of people, can be quoted as a conceptual question regarding printmaking
in that his works are not only made in the printmaking method of
stencil but also the relation between reality and shadow and can be interpreted
as the relation between plate and edition, edition and edition. The
element of the viewer brings forth a more relative, situational relationship in
printmaking. When editions of an image from one matrix are seen by viewers in
different places and times, that image comes to have diverse contexts at the same
time. Park Young Jin produces works regarded as sculptures at a standstill, but
they become furniture when a viewer interacts with them. She takes note of the process by which the
meaning and understanding of a particular work of art can change depending on
the specific situation and the person viewing the work. In her furniture
sculpture, different types of screens are put between two people facing each
other as if playing a game, and the character and relation of their gaze continuously
react and change in different ways. It seems to reflect the true nature of plates as an intermediary
between the world of objects and artist and viewer, and the desire of
printmaking to make a relationship with the viewer through multiple
distribution and communication. When the multiplicity of printmaking is
seen as something to create diverse relationships, it is set free from a mere
reproduction and meets the rich elements of digital media such as combination,
editing, and modification. As the digital media discovers a turning point in
thinking through possibilities of modification and variations in wide and free
range rather than putting weight on infinite reproduction, the multiplicity of
printmaking is a clue to such a turning point, transcending sole-ness. Kang
Jung Hun showcases the multiplicity in an analog manner. He represents
fragments of a spectacle urban scene taken as a snap shot in copperplate prints
and installs multiples of prints together. These images of editions are derived
from the same matrix but they do not seem simply repeating as reproduction, but
look modified and proliferated through changes in arrangements. His work displays in a new way
an extended space where the same images encapsulating a specific space-time are
distanced from the original photographs through the simple physical method of
composing and arranging them from diverse angles. While Kang explores the multiplicity
of print media in connection with urbanity, Lee Ji Yen shows public spaces in a
city where repetitive actions take place, marrying this with the digital media available
for infinite repetition. Repetitively pressing the shutter, Lee captures the
anonymous public moving in one direction at places such as a bridge or an
escalator. Each photograph cuts and blends numerous scenes captured at one
place and reduces them to one constituent unit, forging a new geometric space
through editing, modification, and rearrangement. Her digital
photographs look like abstract patterns from a distance. In these photographs,
a single space-time captured by a viewfinder vanishes, time intersects and
overlaps, and space infinitely repeats and extends. Aesthetics of the multiplicity inherent in prints derives
from the fact that a print can have multiple existences varying in form and
traits, departing form painting’s uniqueness stemming from one image, and with
this a print enters a new relation and naturally has a point of contact with
other new flexible mediums. Printmaking contains an undertone as a media to
make us reconsider the concept of art and the way of thinking that cannot be
limited as a form of art. Starting
from discussions on the multiplicity of printmaking that this exhibition concentrates
on, we will shed light on print as a contemporary media to encapsulate a
variety of discourses. This endeavor is associated with such questions as what
the prints as media can do to analyze our age accurately, rather than a mere
effort to bring established prints to the present age.